Some Hypocrisy Here?
 

I have a question for the forum. I have noticed that in the HUMOR AND JOKES thread there are DOZENS of drawings and cartoons of obviously under-aged boys having sex with their moms, aunts, etc. BUT drawings or cartoons depicting dads having sex with their under-aged daughters (such as the thousands of Randy Dave drawings) is strictly taboo and not allowed. Isn't this a bit hypocritical?

Your thoughts on this matter are welcomed.

There's another site we're on that doesn't allow any kids in photos be they real or cartoons.
I posted a cartoon image that wasn't even sexual in nature, just something I thought was funny.
It got deleted and I received a message from the mods telling me the rules were NO images containing kids.

I'm not into the adults having sex with kids thing so it doesn't really matter to me but I agree with you that if you're going to allow one, the other should be ok too.

I'm surprised anyone "in charge" around here was even paying enough attention to notice.

I did not know there was such a category in all the years here. Agree a double standard and the admins?…….well they can’t get the pics I post in the right fucking category so why would I think they’d screen that mom and son stuff posted?

I think, as much as we try to convince ourselves otherwise, there is still a double standard when it comes to underage sex.
A male teacher with a 13 year old girl is a predator, a monster, a pervert.
A female teacher with a 13 year old boy might be all of the above but with the caveat "Well, what's the harm. I wish a female teacher had done that with me when I was 13."
We accuse the male teacher of preying on the girl, taking advantage of someone who thinks there's love involved
The 13 year old boy just wants to get his dick wet.
Most of the female teachers that have been caught are pretty good looking. I always wonder why they risk everything to fuck a kid when they could probably walk into any bar or grocery store and ask the first halfway decent guy if he wants to fuck.

Totally agree
 

For a site that's supposed to be about sexual freedom, they can be pretty puritanical.